Hoi,
The central point Diego made starts from is that the current broken system
has a POTENTIAL for unstructured, unaccountable changes by whomever.
You do not build on a fundament that is collapsing as it is. A system that
is manifestly broken particularly on the one platform where our new users
are; mobile.
If we are to take arguments seriously, please explain why we should in this
instance. If dismissing such ideas makes him go away AFTER it has been
explained why the arguments do not wash.. Well, the best that can be said
is that it makes the conversation easier, it does not change the quality of
the arguments at all.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 September 2014 09:55, Wil Sinclair <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Your suggestion is to be dismissed with prejudice because it is so
> > obviously wrong in so many ways.. I do not care about a possible
> potential
> > of a broken system at all I may want to think about features that are
> > actively used in this broken system.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
>
> I won't be dismissing it, because Diego makes some very good points
> and articulates the concerns that many in the community have expressed
> well.
>
> Dismissing his ideas won't make them go away. I just hope that
> dismissing them with that prejudice you mentioned doesn't make him go
> away.
>
> ,Wil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
