On 9 December 2014 at 20:35, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I've said elsewhere, it's percieved as desirable by many first-worlders > because we equate that as "everything is equally inexpensive" to level the > playing field. > Except that for the vast majority of the world's population, it means > "everything is equally expensive and unafordable". You may well have nailed the two-liner of why Wikipedia Zero is a good idea. > If we fail to understand the necessity to make exceptions or the > desirability of making Free Knowledge /effectively/ available to the world > then it *is* an absolutist stance. Rather, not *our* absolutism. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
