> > But since Milos asked: In Wikisource changing the original is indeed > > vandalism, but somebody must notice that it's vandalism. AFAIK Wikisource > > doesn't have a proper way to authenticate that the document is in its > > original form.
> Could you elaborate on this? If you open the links in my email, you > will see that the text can be verified against the edition on file, Do you mean the side-by-side ProofreadPage view? > and Wikisource projects typically have *revision* patrolling enabled > to help catch incorrect changes. Revision patrolling is less bulletproof than a checksum, but if it is enough for the people who care about this normative grammar's integrity, it's certainly enough for me. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
