On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just noting that annual plans can go through APG or PEG, but the
> qualificattions and scope are different. Some chapers choose to continue
> with PEG funding becuase it is more flexible. The main limiter on PEG
> funding is that it  will not pay for full time permanent staff; however
> according to Meta it may pay for part time or temporary staff.
>
> APGs and PEGs for annual plans are usually recurring, but PEG funds a
> variety of programs in addition to annual plans.
>
> This is the kind of conversation that I hope Luis and his team will be
> considering holistically in the next several months.
>

Katy of course is part of my team, so we're here, having a conversation :)
Can you elaborate a bit, Pine? You've done a good job answering MZ's
question, so I'm not clear what conversation you meant to highlight -
simply suggestions on how to improve the pages MZ linked to, or...?

Luis


-- 
Luis Villa
Sr. Director of Community Engagement
Wikimedia Foundation
*Working towards a world in which every single human being can freely share
in the sum of all knowledge.*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to