ha, i read the thread and i did not notice the core question :) lets start from the annual plan then: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2015-16
there are 280 persons working for the WMF, all departments are growing. money given to somebody else is shrinking below 10%. the word "fun" is mentioned zero time, and innovation gets one important sentence: "We will create spaces for future community-led innovations and new knowledge creation." and after that innovation is mentioned in the *legal* and *communications* paragraph. but - there is no money attached to it. except maybe paying employees. one could strive to allocate money differently, in the line of "30% goes into grants to improve or develop new technology". making sure that the innovation money is going to all regions of this planet should be self evident. or one could clearly define that community money is spent through local organisations, not central. one could also suppose community money goes to members of the community, not employees taking care about the community. this btw is also a major fundraising problem - people have no problem to give money to community members. but they have a problem if such money is spent on employees. to play the devils advocate, this increasing money spent not within the WMF from <10% to 50% means, in reverse, WMF needs to shrink from 280 persons to 180 persons. one could even advocate for an upper limit of 200 persons for central functions no matter of the income. as food for thought, FIFA has a staff of 300. there are 250 million people playing association football worldwide. best, rupert On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Lodewijk <lodew...@effeietsanders.org> wrote: > Potato potato - availability can be interpreted in many different ways. > Thanks to the free license, we've covered a big part of that by design. > > What activities the WMF should be doing wasn't quite the core of the > discussion though, but rather how big the WMF should be. > > Lodewijk > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Tim Landscheidt <t...@tim-landscheidt.de> > wrote: > >> (anonymous) wrote: >> >> > […] >> >> > But 'getting big' is maybe not the most important thing in the world. >> > Working on our mission, is. And part of that, is security. The WMF is not >> > in this world to play the odds, but rather to ensure that knowledge is >> > freed, and stays free - most specifically by securing Wikipedia's >> continued >> > availability (at least, that is what our deck of cards looks like now). >> >> > Fully focussing on one sigle stream of money may indeed allow you to get >> > more out of it. But the question here is rather, how to you tackle the >> > situation when that stream dries up? And for that question, >> diversification >> > is actually key. >> >> > […] >> >> I don't agree with that. From the Library of Alexandria to >> the Duchess Anna Amalia Library it has always been a mistake >> to keep knowledge in one place and try really hard to keep >> it from falling apart. The biggest advancement in that >> field probably came from Gutenberg's press which allowed >> knowledge to be spread around and resist attempts of censor- >> ship. >> >> When cinema and television came along, the ancient pattern >> repeated: Cultural goods are lost today because the broad- >> casters put them in one vault and then did not maintain the >> fire alarm properly. >> >> We have the same issue now with streaming services: During >> dictatorships, you could hide books and jazz records. Net- >> flix or YouTube just stops serving videos some entity does >> not like, and Amazon can wipe your Kindle clean of anything. >> >> So the diversification for the purpose of the advancement of >> knowledge should not lie in making WMF immortal, but ensur- >> ing that it survives WMF's death. >> >> Tim >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
