On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Chris Keating <[email protected]> wrote: > > 3) 3 weeks for publication of minutes sounds like a reasonable time frame > to me. I'm seeing a few "How can it take 3 WEEKS??!!?!?" reactions from > people. Probably because the Board spends all weekend meeting then on > Monday go back to their jobs. Then someone starts writing up the minutes > from their notes, probably the next weekend. The realise they need to query > something and drop someone an email about it. They respond on Tuesday, by > which point the minute-writer is spending the free evening they dedicate to > Board work on addressing some other issue and the next chance they get to > look at it is first thing on Saturday morning - they spend Saturday morning > writing up minutes and then circulate a draft .... which then someone wants > to amend ... .you get the picture. :)
Why would minutes be written after the fact instead of during the meeting by the designated note taker(s)? -- brion _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
