I'm honestly not sure what this thread is meant to achieve. Might I suggest that if you object to the reporting you contact the author, rather than drag their work in a largely-unknown internal mailing list? It's likely to be more productive.
On Friday, 29 April 2016, Benjamin Lees <emufarm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Stephen Philbrick > <stephen.w.philbr...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > and it is astonishing how bad it is. > > If you're astonished, then I'm afraid you haven't read enough news > articles about Wikipedia yet. :-( > > P.S. MAYBE IT'S TIME WE REEVALUATED OUR STANCE ON ALLCAPS. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;> > ?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
