Rogol, First, it's very well established that privacy is essential to not just the creation of educational content by Foundation volunteers, but to the ability of readers to have unfettered access to that content. I am sure you are aware that the Foundation has been pursuing a lawsuit for years against the U.S. government to protect readers privacy: https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/23._aclu_appeal_brief_2.17.2016.pdf
The European Commission is seeking the power to fine ISPs for breaches to their users' privacy, which would certainly strengthen the Foundation's projects' readers ability to access information without threat of eavesdropping by commercial interests, such as having their searches for medical conditions made available for sale to insurance and marketing companies. If you have any reason to believe otherwise, please say so. Secondly, where did you find that mission statement you quoted? It is not the one at https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Mission_statement On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Rogol Domedonfors <[email protected]> wrote: > James, > > Could you articulate how, in your view, the implementation of the proposed > directive, or otherwise, would affect the Wikimedia Foundation's mission of > "encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free, > multilingual, educational content, and to providing the full content of > these wiki-based projects to the public free of charge," please? Because > if you can't, then the answer to your question has to be "No, it isn't". > > "Rogol" > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here is an interesting quote of a Mozilla Foundation lawyer from >> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/11/mozilla_wants_eu_ >> to_slow_down_its_eprivacy_directive_process/ >> >> "draft Regulation imposes very specific restrictions on the technology >> industry that may challenge the business models of some ISPs. In some >> areas, obligations are proscriptive, undermining the principle of >> technological neutrality that this legislation needs to withstand the >> test of time in a rapidly changing environment" >> >> Is it appropriate for the Wikimedia Foundation to respond to this sort >> of thing? Mozilla is almost entirely funded by ad-supported >> businesses at present. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ >> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ >> wiki/Wikimedia-l >> New messages to: [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
