On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Chris Keating <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Simply highlighting the ~1 page of arguably controversial stuff in a 67 > page document is also unlikely to be optimal, because it creates a biased > and misleading impression of the whole document, and gives the impression > (accurately or not) that one's main interest is stirring up controversy.
That's very dismissive of legitimate concerns. If something is of genuine worry, how many pages should it take up before we are allowed to raise our concerns about it? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
