Today's article in the Guardian [1] is one of many on "Fontgate", regarding the date Microsoft's "Calibri" font [2] became available and its relevance to allegations of corruption in Pakistan. The author of the article doesn't seem aware that the "company" Wikipedia doesn't decide when pages are protected, nor under what circumstances protection is applied.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/13/fontgate-microsoft-wikipedia-and-the-scandal-threatening-the-pakistani-pm

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calibri

- Pax aka Funcrunch

--
Pax Ahimsa Gethen | p...@funcrunch.org | http://funcrunch.org | Pronouns: 
they/them/their


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to