Hi Andrew, Thanks for the info. Perhaps the statistics have changed since 2010. Are you aware of any more recent studies?
It's entirely possible that the conference that I attended was an anomaly, but in any case it would be good to have a more recent study (preferably with a larger sample size and information about how sampling was done) if that kind of information is available. "Mapping parties" seem to be common in OSM, and if they're successful in narrowing the gender gap that information might be of interest to Leila given the kind of research that she's planning to do with trying to engage cohorts of users in Wikimedia. If you know of research about about the success of mapping parties with regards to diversity, it would be nice if you could share. Thanks, Pine On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Andrew Hall <hall1...@umn.edu> wrote: > Hi Pine, > > Thank you for sharing your experience at State of the Map USA. In the talk > on Wednesday, I was referring to a survey of 426 OSM contributors by Haklay > and Budhathoki  from 2010 where 96% of participants said they were male. > > References: > 1. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/ > 16461/Horizon%20March%202010%20(Haklay%20and%20Budhahtoki).pdf > > Thanks, > Andrew > > > On Jul 26, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For what it's worth, I noted that when I tended the State of the Map USA > > conference last year, there seemed to be a *higher* representation of > women > > in the conference than there were at the WikiConference USA events that > > I've attended. I was surprised to hear the presenter say that OSM has > 95%+ > > male participation, and I'd like to know the origin of that number. I was > > so impressed by the relatively high percentage of female participants at > > State of the Map USA that I had a conversation with one of the organizers > > about how OSM seemed to be much more successful than Wikimedia at > engaging > > female contributors. Perhaps there are at least some places in which OSM > > has relatively good gender diversity. > > > > Pine > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk > > > > wrote: > > > >> On 25 July 2017 at 19:38, Sarah R <srodl...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Freedom versus Standardization: Structured Data Generation in a Peer > >>> Production CommunityBy *Andrew Hall* > >> > >> There's some discussion of the talk , on the UK OSM mailing list: > >> > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017- > July/020401.html > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wiki-research-l mailing list > >> wiki-researc...@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wiki-research-l mailing list > > wiki-researc...@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > wiki-researc...@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>