Without needing to go into further detail, it is because to be a membership
organization, pseudonyms aren't acceptable; all members must provide their
full legal names and addresses.  I also cannot think of a membership
organization that does not charge a membership fee, although I suppose it
is possible; but anything requiring a financial contribution would limit
the membership to those who have the money to pay to join, which is
antithetical to the movement's philosophy.

Risker/Anne

On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 13:41, Todd Allen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why would we "not want it to be a membership organization"? In fact, many
> of us want exactly that, since the WMF seems to think it can lord it over
> the communities instead of fulfilling its role of serving them.
>
> The new Board rules basically say that the Board itself gets to say how the
> community-based members are selected, instead of having actual bylaws as to
> how it happens. I'd like to see it done very simply: Those eight seats
> (forming a majority) on the Board should be elected (not nominated,
> elected) by the community, with the Board having no veto power over the
> results of the election.
>
> Todd
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:45 PM Brad Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This is a very, very old and tired argument. If you do not understand
> > United States non-profit corporations, go educate yourself about those
> > first. If your perspective is non-US based, you may have a different
> frame
> > of mind which is irreconcilable with the way WMF is. Take all the time
> you
> > need to see the differences before attacking WMF for (a) what it is and
> (b)
> > why it isn't what you want it to be.
> >
> > WMF exists legally, and has as its foundation organizational principle,
> > authority vested in a Board. WMF is not a membership organization. You
> > would not want it to be a membership organization (as a matter of law).
> >
> > Please temper your criticism accordingly.
> >
> > Brad Patrick
> > Former WMF General Counsel
> >
> > On 10/7/20, 12:47 PM, "Wikimedia-l on behalf of Paulo Santos Perneta" <
> > [email protected] on behalf of
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     I knew they are theoretically self-appointed, but was under the
> > impression
> >     that at least until now an appearance of democracy and legitimacy
> > towards
> >     the community has been respected, which no longer seems to be the
> case.
> >     I wonder what would be the legitimacy of a self-appointing body in
> the
> > eyes
> >     of the Wikimedia Movement, and all the communities which are part of
> > it?
> >
> >     Regards,
> >     Paulo
> >
> >     Adam Wight <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta,
> > 7/10/2020 à(s)
> >     17:20:
> >
> >     > Greetings, this is a semiautomated response pointing out that the
> >     > Wikimedia Foundation Board is not elected, it's self-appointing.
> The
> >     > so-called "elections" are in fact nominations to be considered by
> the
> >     > Board.  Therefore, the Bylaws have not been broken.
> >     >
> >     > This is an unfortunate arrangement, please see [1] for some
> > background
> >     > about the conversion from a membership organization to a
> > non-membership
> >     > organization which is no longer legally required to hold elections.
> >     >
> >     > Regards,
> >     >
> >     > Adam W.
> >     > [[mw:User:Adamw]]
> >     >
> >     > [1]
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_membership_controversy
> >     >
> >     > On 10/7/20 5:55 PM, Paulo Santos Perneta wrote:
> >     > > The terms of 3 BoT members expired last month, and the BoT itself
> > decided
> >     > > to extend them? What is the legitimacy of that? And why is a BoT
> > which is
> >     > > expected to be in a mere interim management waiting for
> elections,
> >     > > presenting profound changes to its Bylaws [1]?
> >     > >
> >     > > [1] -
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/October_2020_-_Proposed_Bylaws_changes
> >     > >
> >     > > Best,
> >     > > Paulo
> >     > >
> >     > > Nataliia Tymkiv <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta,
> >     > 7/10/2020
> >     > > à(s) 16:49:
> >     > >
> >     > >> Hello,
> >     > >>
> >     > >> I can answer a few of the questions raised in this thread.
> >     > >>
> >     > >> When the Board postponed the community selection of trustees, we
> > also
> >     > >> extended the terms of the trustees in the affected seats (María
> >     > Sefidari,
> >     > >> Dariusz Jemielniak, and James Heilman)[1]. Their terms were
> > originally
> >     > set
> >     > >> to expire last month, but because of that term extension they
> are
> > still
> >     > >> serving as trustees, and as such María remains the Board Chair
> and
> >     > Dariusz
> >     > >> and James continue on as Committee Chairs[2].
> >     > >>
> >     > >> Raju Narisetti and Esra'a Al Shafei have been reappointed to the
> > Board
> >     > for
> >     > >> an additional three-year term[3][4].
> >     > >>
> >     > >> The current members of the Board of Trustees are listed on the
> > Wikimedia
> >     > >> Foundation website[5].
> >     > >>
> >     > >> We do not currently have a shortage of trustees on the Board,
> and
> > we
> >     > have
> >     > >> had a quorum for every decision we have made this year. We have
> >     > published
> >     > >> some outstanding Board records, many of which were just approved
> > at our
> >     > >> recent meeting in September[6][7].
> >     > >>
> >     > >> I have just sent an email to this list, as well as posted an
> > update to
> >     > >> Meta-Wiki, with a request for feedback on matters related to the
> >     > >> Foundation’s Bylaws and trustee selection[8]. That announcement
> > contains
> >     > >> more information about the postponed community selection of
> > trustees.
> >     > >>
> >     > >> Best regards,
> >     > >>
> >     > >> antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
> >     > >>
> >     > >> Vice Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [1]
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Postponement_of_Community_Selection_of_Trustees_and_Extension_of_Community_Selected_Trustee_Terms_until_next_selection_process
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [2]
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Board_Officers_and_Committee_Membership,_2019
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [3]
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Renewing_Raju_Narisetti%27s_Appointment_to_the_Board_of_Trustees,_2020
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [4]
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Renewing_Esra%27a_Al_Shafei%27s_Appointment_to_the_Board_of_Trustees,_2020
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [5] https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [6] https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetings
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [7] https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolutions
> >     > >>
> >     > >> [8]
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/October_2020_-_Call_for_feedback_about_Bylaws_changes_and_Board_candidate_rubric
> >     > >> <
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/July_2020_-_Call_for_feedback_about_Bylaws_changes_and_Board_candidate_rubric
> >     > >>
> >     > >> *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your
> normal
> >     > working
> >     > >> hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during
> > weekend.
> >     > You
> >     > >> should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off.
> > Thank you
> >     > in
> >     > >> advance!*
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >>
> >     > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:52 PM Bill Takatoshi <
> > [email protected]>
> >     > >> wrote:
> >     > >>
> >     > >>> After I asked my questions on September 4, I was sent the
> message
> >     > >>> below by some role account I've never heard of, asking about
> > claims
> >     > >>> that have used the names of five other people. I don't edit
> > under my
> >     > >>> real name, but I have never used the names in the linked forum
> >     > >>> postings.
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> The linked posts also claim that the Foundation's nonprofit
> > status is
> >     > >>> at risk. I am not a lawyer, but I am skeptical of that claim
> even
> >     > >>> though five Trustees whose three-year terms expired in August
> >     > >>> apparently voted on a Resolution in a Board meeting on
> September
> > 24.
> >     > >>> According to Section 4 of the Bylaws, "A quorum shall consist
> of
> > a
> >     > >>> majority of Trustees then in office." Section 6 says, "the
> Board
> > may
> >     > >>> continue doing business as a Board during the vacancy of any
> > Trustee
> >     > >>> position." Therefore, since four of the five remaining Trustees
> > all
> >     > >>> voted in favor, the Resolution was properly carried, in my
> > layperson's
> >     > >>> view. I am less certain about the propriety of allowing a
> Trustee
> >     > >>> whose three year term expired to continue to serve as Chair.
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> The lack of any update or even ETA for an update on
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2020#Postpone%3F
> >     > >>> is baffling. Elections have never been held in person, only
> > online,
> >     > >>> and so the excuse that they were postponed because of the
> > pandemic
> >     > >>> crisis seems extremely suspicious. Indefinitely delaying
> > elections for
> >     > >>> such a vacuous reason makes the Foundation look like the worst
> > of the
> >     > >>> bad actors in today's international political climate. Doesn't
> > the
> >     > >>> cancelled travel of the pandemic crisis give the Foundation
> more
> > time
> >     > >>> to hold elections, not less? Whether non-profit status is at
> > risk or
> >     > >>> not, I would hope that the Foundation, Board, and Elections
> > Committee
> >     > >>> would be more interested in upholding the principles of good
> >     > >>> governance than failing to even announce a new schedule or even
> > a date
> >     > >>> by which a new schedule will be announced.
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> -Will
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:31 PM Gender Desk <
> > [email protected]>
> >     > >>> wrote:
> >     > >>>> Mr. Takatoshi,
> >     > >>>>
> >     > >>>> Wikipediocracy has suggested that you have also used the names
> > "Rogol
> >     > >>> Domedonfors, Renée Bagslint, Jennifer Pryor-Summers, Felicity
> > Braingut,
> >     > >>> Thomas Townsend and others."
> >     > >>> http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=11567
> >     > >>>> Can you comment on that?
> >     > >>>>
> >     > >>>> Regards,
> >     > >>>> Genderdesk
> >     > >>>>
> >     > >>>> genderdesk.wordpress.com
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:38 PM Samuel Klein <
> [email protected]>
> >     > wrote:
> >     > >>>> Can anyone from the elections committee comment?  What is the
> > current
> >     > >>>> plan?    //S
> >     > >>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:05 PM Bill Takatoshi <
> >     > [email protected]
> >     > >>>> wrote:
> >     > >>>>
> >     > >>>>> How long can the Foundation legally postpone Board of
> Trustees
> >     > >>> elections?
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2020#Postpone%3F
> >     > >>>>> has a comment from April saying, "Once things get moving
> again,
> >     > >>>>> appopriate [sic] date for the election will be decided and an
> >     > >>>>> announcement will be made."
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees#Current_members
> >     > >>>>> suggests that five board members terms end on "Wikimania
> 2020"
> > -- but
> >     > >>>>> is that accurate?
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>
> >     >
> >
> https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resolution:Term_Limit_Proposal_for_Bylaws
> >     > >>>>> is clear that "All Board terms are three years" and "the term
> > of each
> >     > >>>>> such appointment shall not exceed three years."
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>> Who are the current members of the Board of Trustees?
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>> Can the board achieve a quorum in its present state?
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>>> Who is the Chair currently?
> >     > >>>>>
> >     > >>>> --
> >     > >>>> Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1
> > 617 529
> >     > >>> 4266
> >     > >>>
> >     > >>> _______________________________________________
> >     > >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >     > >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >     > >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     > >>> New messages to: [email protected]
> >     > >>> Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >     > >>> <mailto:[email protected]
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >     > >>>
> >     > >> _______________________________________________
> >     > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >     > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >     > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     > >> New messages to: [email protected]
> >     > >> Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >     > >> <mailto:[email protected]
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >     > >>
> >     > > _______________________________________________
> >     > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >     > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >     > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >     > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >     > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >     > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >     > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     > New messages to: [email protected]
> >     > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >     > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >     >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >     New messages to: [email protected]
> >     Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to