As Gnangarra has stated and what I want to state, the reasonable man test has 
in it a bias. I have also stated that we may use some equivalent words, not a 
must for using "common sense". I understand the limitation of "common sense", 
and would like to state such a word is definitely not the best solution. Yet, I 
cannot find a proper solution to replace the word "reasonable person", as I am 
also using English logic to think of the articles of UCoC. I therefore highly 
encourage people using other languages may give their suggestions as choices.

In the way we find the alternative word of "reasonable person", I also 
encourage to make more examples to help people make their mind clearer. The 
examples do help people to find the pattern and form their sense.

Arthur Cheung 
User:だ*ぜ (Dasze)
Board Member of Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong (WMHKG)

> Dan Garry (Deskana) <djgw...@gmail.com> 於 2021年2月22日 P.M.10:59 寫道:
> 
> It's so great to see the Universal Code of Conduct come to fruition. As a 
> movement we were severly lagging behind others in adopting a code of conduct, 
> and I'm glad to see we've reached parity. This is a step in the right 
> direction.
> 
> Dan
> 
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 11:59, María Sefidari <ma...@wikimedia.org 
> <mailto:ma...@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I’m pleased to announce that the Board of Trustees has unanimously approved a 
> Universal Code of Conduct for the Wikimedia projects and movement.[1]  A 
> Universal Code of Conduct was one of the final recommendations of the 
> Movement Strategy 2030 process - a multi-year, participatory community effort 
> to define the future of our movement. The final Universal Code of Conduct 
> seeks to address disparities in conduct policies across our hundreds of 
> projects and communities, by creating a binding minimum set of standards for 
> conduct on the Wikimedia projects that directly address many of the 
> challenges that contributors face.
> 
> The Board is deeply grateful to the communities who have grappled with these 
> challenging topics. Over the past six months, communities around the world 
> have participated in conversations and consultations to help build this code 
> collectively, including local discussions in 19 languages, surveys, 
> discussions on Meta, and policy drafting by a committee of volunteers and 
> staff. The document presented to us reflects a significant investment of time 
> and effort by many of you, and especially by the joint staff/volunteer 
> committee who created the base draft after reviewing input collected from 
> community outreach efforts. We also appreciate the dedication of the 
> Foundation, and its Trust & Safety policy team, in getting us to this phase.
> 
> This was the first phase of our Universal Code of Conduct - from here, the 
> Trust & Safety team will begin consultations on how best to enforce this 
> code. In the coming weeks, they will follow-up with more instructions on how 
> you can participate in discussions around enforcing the new code. Over the 
> next few months, they will be facilitating consultation discussions in many 
> local languages, with our affiliates, and on Meta to support a new 
> volunteer/staff committee in drafting enforcement pathways. For more 
> information on the process, timeline, and how to participate in this next 
> phase, please review the Universal Code of Conduct page on Meta.[2]
> 
> The Universal Code of Conduct represents an essential step towards our vision 
> of a world in which all people can participate in the sum of all knowledge. 
> Together, we have built something extraordinary. Today, we celebrate this 
> milestone in making our movement a safer space for contribution for all. 
> 
> On behalf of the Board of Trustees,
> 
> María Sefidari
> Board Chair
> 
> [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Draft_review 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Draft_review> 
> 
> [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines> and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l>
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org 
> <mailto:Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l>, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to