Thank you. It is interesting to consider how a more granular coverage of 
elections, coverage which includes notable mass media events, e.g., news 
stories and social media events, caused by and/or strategically reacted to by 
political campaigns, parties, and organizations, coverage which includes 
election tactics and strategies, can enhance Wikipedia and provide its readers 
with fuller pictures of elections.

I am starting to think about possibilities with respect to these new articles. 
I am looking forward to seeing how Wikimedians choose to create and structure 
them. A hope is that future elections will improve as a result.


Best regards,
Adam

From: Risker<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 5:51 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Encyclopedic Coverage of American Elections

Hello Adam -

This looks like a series of articles that could reasonably be made about the 
elections of any country:  for example, "Election tactics in the 2000 US 
Presidential election" or "Election tactics in the 1986 British House of 
Commons election" or whatever. Draft space is right there waiting for you or 
others to create the articles.  I'm sure for many of these elections there will 
be lots of available reference sources, both contemporaneous and in terms of 
historical research.  It will be important to ensure that no political bias is 
introduced into the articles.  Of course, there is also the question of whether 
these tactics had any effect on the outcome of any given election, and what 
that effect was; again, that will probably need reference sources from 
independent academic researchers and books.

Incidentally, this is an international list; at least half of the people who 
post here live and work in countries outside of the United States.  I am 
uncomfortable to see Wikimedians referred to as "we, the American people", and 
I hope that you will reconsider that kind of approach toward any project.  Even 
English Wikipedia, which I assume is your target audience here, is edited more 
by people outside the US than those inside it.

Risker/Anne

On Sat, 18 Sept 2021 at 14:50, Adam Sobieski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Wikimedia,

I have a psephological and election historical observation that I would like to 
share with Wikimedia.

Low-brow, crass, and manipulative political advertising and marketing, various 
hot-button, third-rail, dog-whistle, and wedge issues, have been deployed by 
candidates, campaigns, and political actors and organizations during American 
election seasons. These tactics are very much a part of our elections and 
appear to be subsequently omitted from encyclopedic (e.g., Wikipedia) and 
historical coverage of the elections (e.g., 2000 – 2020).

How low have election campaigns gone? Very. Yet, for some reasons, American 
encyclopedists and historians appear to be almost complicit, glossing over 
these problematic election campaign tactics. Each historical election appears 
to be reduced to a single encyclopedia article or small cluster of such 
articles, only some such articles attempt to list election issues, and no such 
article mentions campaign advertising and marketing themes and tactics deployed 
by campaigns, political actors, and organizations on radio, television, the 
Web, or social media.

I propose that encyclopedists, scholars, and scientists seek to attend to, 
remember, and record election campaign mass media tactics and manipulations 
lest we, the American people, be doomed to repeat them in future elections. 
Perhaps by remembering the election campaign advertising and marketing tactics 
utilized, including on social media, and listing them encyclopedically, a 
buoyant pressure can be created with which to elevate our American politics.

Thank you for your time and for considering these ideas with which to improve 
encyclopedic coverage of American elections.


Best regards,
Adam Sobieski

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 
guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/MMHYBNWT6R6HO567QOIYEXBELL27YVK7/
To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/AHPE2E3ZDBP5XGITTOINAD4WFU6UDOHW/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to