On 21/8/22 00:17:59, Quim Gil wrote:
Given that this Forum is especially conceived to better support those who can't or won't use Meta for discussions and collaboration, we don't think a Meta RFC would be the right tool for this task.
I think this is a good example of the problem here. You've already decided that on-wiki is not the answer, so any appeals for you to do things on-wiki get noted down in documents like this, and promptly ignored. It's a very high impact bias that undermines the whole report and process. A more neutral (and independent?) review that took into account more of the options would have helped.
BTW, personally I'm worried about scope creep here - if it is just movement strategy, then the damage is at least limited to that topic, but it's already crept into being involved in the WMF board election, for example. Hopefully at least that trend won't continue?
Anyhow, see you on-wiki. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/37ERRZ7TLEFQBA5YEZDPI2T5I5GCG2TY/ To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
