Again, we should not remove content unless we have proved in each particular case that it falls within this rule. Restraint!
Enoch On 13/11/2008, Peter Halasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IF there's a general consensus that the law is overreaching and silly > AND we do decide to follow the letter of the law and remove content anyway > THEN I propose we set a date for the removal of content, and publish a > press release about why we're removing the content and how we feel > about silly laws, so at least the issue gets some media attention, and > the wider public can gain a better appreciation for the ethos of > Wikimedia and free/open content. > > Does anyone disagree, and think the ban on photography in reserves is > a positive or neutral thing? > > Peter. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
