Again, we should not remove content unless we have proved in each
particular case that it falls within this rule. Restraint!


On 13/11/2008, Peter Halasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IF there's a general consensus that the law is overreaching and silly
> AND we do decide to follow the letter of the law and remove content anyway
> THEN I propose we set a date for the removal of content, and publish a
> press release about why we're removing the content and how we feel
> about silly laws, so at least the issue gets some media attention, and
> the wider public can gain a better appreciation for the ethos of
> Wikimedia and free/open content.
> Does anyone disagree, and think the ban on photography in reserves is
> a positive or neutral thing?
> Peter.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaau-l mailing list

Wikimediaau-l mailing list

Reply via email to