2009/5/23 Stephen Bain <stephen.b...@gmail.com>:

> It's certainly good for Creative Commons. It's really a neutral for
> the free culture movement as a whole, since the licences remain as
> incompatible as ever, and since the opening up of Wikimedia content to
> be incorporated into CC-BY-SA content (and vice versa) is
> counterbalanced by the loss of the ability to work with GFDL resources
> in the same way.

What GFDL resources? There's Wikipedia and ... Wikipedia.

Really, Wikipedia was the only significant corpus of GFDL content. Now
we can join the rest of the world.

- d.

Wikimediaau-l mailing list

Reply via email to