Hi, I am also agree with Mr. hari prasad point of view because a separate developer list for indic languages will help these languages project to resolve any technical issue easily because most of them are facing the same problems, In coming time Indian languages wii projects are aspected to grow fast that's what wiki media foundation want so a separate developer list will help these smaller project to get their bugs resolved easily.
Thank you and regards Mayur On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Anivar Aravind <anivar.arav...@gmail.com>wrote: > I tend to agree with Gerard's views & Siebrand's points. Since there > are many lists , Yet another list will be a waste . There are many > lists for Indic Specific issues such as Indlinux list, which can be > also used to connect with indic developers > > Anivar > > On 1/31/11, praveenp <me.prav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think Siebrand is correct! From what I see from wiki projects, I feel > > problems in Indian languages are common with other non-Indian complex > > scripts. If we create an 'Indian language developers list', I think that > > will be an unnecessary dividing of development power. > > > > But also I think mediawiki should consider non-latin script probems more > > seriously. (For eg: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21497 > > an old bug, still not fixed. > > Other common SVG rendering is also bad (a server problem ?), please see > > https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25140. I am almost sure > > that these bugs affects all complex scripts, than just Indian languages.) > > > > Praveen > > > > On Monday 31 January 2011 02:34 PM, Siebrand Mazeland wrote: > >> Dear Hari and others, > >> > >> I think there is no obvious need whatsoever for an "Indian language > >> developers list". If there are issues the require attention and > >> discussion related to language support in MediaWiki, there are three > >> mailing lists that qualify for discussion already -- depending on the > >> exact topic -, and bugzilla is the place to register the issue. > >> Please be aware that cocooning leads to separation, while one of the > >> strongpoints of the Wikimedia movements is being involved worldwide. > >> > >> Mailing lists: > >> > >> * MediaWiki language support: > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-i18n > >> * Wikimedia related technology: > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > >> * Wikimedia translators: > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l > >> > >> Of these three lists, currently only wikitech-l has a reasonable > >> volume. The other lists are direly awaiting issues you will raise and > >> discuss. For hardcore translation contributions for MediaWiki and its > >> extensions, you are of course very welcome at > >> https://translatewiki.net. Many Indian language need a lot more love > >> with regards to localisation. > >> > >> I hope you will reconsider having a need for a separate mailing list > >> for developers with regards to language support for languages from > India. > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > > > > > > > -- > "[It is not] possible to distinguish between 'numerical' and > 'nonnumerical' algorithms, as if numbers were somehow different from > other kinds of precise information." - Donald Knuth > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindiaemail@example.com > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindiafirstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l