Yes, I choose many important factors that was available in wikimedia stats, The formula was derived by me but as a past student of economics i tried to do my best, basically i marked each factor on the scale of 100 so that no factor alone may affect the whole survey.
Thank you On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Ravishankar <ravidre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mayur, > > Interesting analysis. Thanks for the hard work. > > Is there any academic reference based on which the formula was arrived or > is it empirical? > > One possible indicator for a Wikipedia's quality may be offline activisim / > organizing as it indicates the community's rapport which is very vital for > overall quality control. Things like meetups, releasing CD etc., > > Ravi > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindiafirstname.lastname@example.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaindia-l mailing list Wikimediaindiaemail@example.com https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l