It is intentional, yes. The idea is you have a completely new
election, although we don't have to do it this way if we don't want
to.

On Jan 16, 5:02 pm, "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Details are here: Please let me know if you think they will be effective as
> > drafted.
>
> >http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_UK_v2.0%2FElect...
>
> > Comments / changes as always welcome on meta or this email list.
>
> As it is currently written, even those that do get over 50% would have
> to retire at the EGM, is this intentional? They've been duly elected
> to a 1 year term by a majority of the membership, I don't see why they
> can't complete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.orghttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UKhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l

Reply via email to