It is intentional, yes. The idea is you have a completely new election, although we don't have to do it this way if we don't want to.
On Jan 16, 5:02 pm, "Thomas Dalton" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Details are here: Please let me know if you think they will be effective as > > drafted. > > >http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_UK_v2.0%2FElect... > > > Comments / changes as always welcome on meta or this email list. > > As it is currently written, even those that do get over 50% would have > to retire at the EGM, is this intentional? They've been duly elected > to a 1 year term by a majority of the membership, I don't see why they > can't complete it. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected]http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UKhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
