If a company or business comes to terms with the notability guidelines for sources, they are likely best placed to argue their case for an entry in Wikipedia - or expansion of an existing entry. They would be negligent were they not maintaining records of all press coverage.
Part of the process of disclosing their interest/involvement should be revealing the IP addresses of their sales and marketing people - so they can be pre-emptively blocked. :P Brian. -----Original Message----- From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton Sent: 15 February 2009 19:48 To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Suggestion for a good contact 2009/2/15 Casey Brown <cbrown1023...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, joseph seddon > <life_is_bitter_sw...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> Its a wikimedia address. >> > > No, I think he meant the conference subject itself seemed like using > Wikipedia for "spam" purposes. I don't think he was suggesting > Lennart was a spammer. ;-) Indeed! Lennart has explained the conference to me and it is what it sounds like, but it sounds like they actually want to do it by following our rules, so it sounds great to me. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
