If a company or business comes to terms with the notability guidelines for sources, they are likely best placed to argue their case for an entry in Wikipedia - or expansion of an existing entry. They would be negligent were they not maintaining records of all press coverage.
Part of the process of disclosing their interest/involvement should be revealing the IP addresses of their sales and marketing people - so they can be pre-emptively blocked. :P Brian. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton Sent: 15 February 2009 19:48 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Suggestion for a good contact 2009/2/15 Casey Brown <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, joseph seddon > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Its a wikimedia address. >> > > No, I think he meant the conference subject itself seemed like using > Wikipedia for "spam" purposes. I don't think he was suggesting > Lennart was a spammer. ;-) Indeed! Lennart has explained the conference to me and it is what it sounds like, but it sounds like they actually want to do it by following our rules, so it sounds great to me. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
