On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:03 +0000, David Gerard wrote: > 2009/12/1 Douglas Gardner <microchi...@btinternet.com>: > > > From a personal point of view, having a really whacky colour would be nice > > -- like a vibrant pink logo, á la Amnesty International's colour schemes > > (but WMUK :)). However, I doubt that the Wikimedia Identity Guidelines > > would let us. > > Perhaps a logo such as [love needed], although that's more of an inside > > joke? There's some alternative fundraising banners floating around at Meta > > that we could adapt if we wanted slogans. A WMUK logo with a monospace "<3", > > as we're internet based, washed out in the background? > > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines > > > If we come up with rough consensus on something plausible, it wouldn't > hurt to at least ask WMF about a logo variant.
Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than permission. ;-) If you're prepared to quickly take down anything deemed too horrific you should not have any issue experimenting with logo design variants. Based on the current fundraiser, I think the volunteers can do better than most pro advertising agencies. It's in the metrics the ad agencies are really good for. -- Brian McNeil <brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org>|http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil Content of this message in no way represents the opinions or official position of the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its projects. * Problems replying? Forward bounces to bria...@skynet.be to raise with Godaddy Hosting.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org