On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:03 +0000, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/12/1 Douglas Gardner <microchi...@btinternet.com>:
> > From a personal point of view, having a really whacky colour would be nice
> > -- like a vibrant pink logo, รก la Amnesty International's colour schemes
> > (but WMUK :)).  However, I doubt that the Wikimedia Identity Guidelines
> > would let us.
> > Perhaps a logo such as [love needed], although that's more of an inside
> > joke? There's some alternative fundraising banners floating around at Meta
> > that we could adapt if we wanted slogans. A WMUK logo with a monospace "<3",
> > as we're internet based, washed out in the background?
> > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Wikimedia_visual_identity_guidelines
> If we come up with rough consensus on something plausible, it wouldn't
> hurt to at least ask WMF about a logo variant.

Sometimes it is easier to ask forgiveness than permission. ;-)

If you're prepared to quickly take down anything deemed too horrific you
should not have any issue experimenting with logo design variants. Based
on the current fundraiser, I think the volunteers can do better than
most pro advertising agencies. It's in the metrics the ad agencies are
really good for.

Brian McNeil 
Content of this message in no way represents the opinions or official position
of the Wikimedia Foundation or any of its projects.
* Problems replying? Forward bounces to bria...@skynet.be to raise with Godaddy 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Wikimedia UK mailing list
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to