Magnus Manske wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Charles Matthews > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While the Telegraph may possibly be correct that this is the first >> time for a British court to make such an order, I doubt this is the >> first instance of that clause being invoked. >> > > Yes, but the Telegraph is a British newspaper, so all other instances > are not noteworthy by default :-) > Agreed, but my point really is that anyone dealing with the media would be better prepared with some knowledge of other instances. And I don't instantly have the facts (some of what I know about this might be ArbCom-related and so privileged).
Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
