2010/1/6 Charles Matthews <[email protected]>: > Thomas Dalton wrote: >> >> I agree - my first draft starts off talking about how we support the >> Ofqual guidance and just mentions the Telegraph at the end. The former >> part should be expanded. The Ofqual issuing this guidance is >> newsworthy, as evidenced by the Telegraph writing about it, so we >> should be mostly talking about that. Please add your "riff" to the >> press release. >> >> > Isn't this the topical moment to announce, though, that WMUK will be > posting/has posted on its own wiki a concise but expert-written guide on > how Wikipedia should be used? Amplifying what Ofqual said, and useful > alike to teachers and students. We would of course have to write such a > thing, but that's a matter of cutting GFDL text to length really. (Err, > the site says nothing about GFDL right now.)
My draft includes a link to such a guide on Wikipedia - do we need to write another one? > Not to complicate the issue, but basically Ofqual have it right, so this > is a good time to get the attention of the teaching profession with our > message. Think perhaps in terms of aiming at the Times Educational > Supplement. What would they likely print about this? Sending the release to the TES would make sense. I don't think we need anything different for TES than other press - this is a story about education, so they should be interested in it. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
