I don't see a problem. They've attributed it both to the actual user and to Wikimedia (I would have preferred Wikimedia Commons, but close enough). What more do you want? I'm not aware of any requirement to link to Commons.
On 12 April 2011 09:02, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> wrote: > The BBC has published a timeline article about Fukushima: > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13017282 > > At the end of the article is a schematic drawing of a boiling water reactor. > The image contains "Source: RobbyBer/Wikimedia". Not as text, mind > you, just part of the GIF. > > No link to Commons. > > The images on Commons that look similar and are based on RobbyBer's > work (e.g. [1]) are all GFDL/CC-BY-SA. > > Looks like someone tried, probably whoever edited the SVG, but was > ignored somewhere down the line... > > Yes, there's many images "just taken" from Wiki(m|p)edia on the web, > but this one is rather prominent. Maybe someone should write the BBC a > friendly mail, reminding them that "IP piracy" will get them into > Gitmo these days ;-) > > Cheers, > Magnus > > [1] > https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Schema_siedewasserreaktor_groß.png > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
