I might be mistaken, but doesn't the "-SA" in "CC-BY-SA" require mentioning the license?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a problem. They've attributed it both to the actual user > and to Wikimedia (I would have preferred Wikimedia Commons, but close > enough). What more do you want? I'm not aware of any requirement to > link to Commons. > > On 12 April 2011 09:02, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> wrote: >> The BBC has published a timeline article about Fukushima: >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13017282 >> >> At the end of the article is a schematic drawing of a boiling water reactor. >> The image contains "Source: RobbyBer/Wikimedia". Not as text, mind >> you, just part of the GIF. >> >> No link to Commons. >> >> The images on Commons that look similar and are based on RobbyBer's >> work (e.g. [1]) are all GFDL/CC-BY-SA. >> >> Looks like someone tried, probably whoever edited the SVG, but was >> ignored somewhere down the line... >> >> Yes, there's many images "just taken" from Wiki(m|p)edia on the web, >> but this one is rather prominent. Maybe someone should write the BBC a >> friendly mail, reminding them that "IP piracy" will get them into >> Gitmo these days ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> [1] >> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Schema_siedewasserreaktor_groß.png >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
