That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for, thanks. I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is elsewhere on WMF projects.
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil <[email protected]> wrote: > > All good stuff, but... > > > A QR code could be placed at a relevant war memorial, it points to > > a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and transcripts. > > I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article > about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/ > Wikisource, and the book. > Brian McNeil. -- http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter. Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
