I was assuming that part of the project would involve making sure the article wasn't just a stub...
On 25 October 2011 23:32, Brian McNeil <[email protected]> wrote: > That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for, thanks. > > I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just > feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never > get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is > elsewhere on WMF projects. > > > > On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All good stuff, but... >> >> > A QR code could be placed at a relevant war memorial, it points to >> > a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and >> > transcripts. >> >> I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article >> about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/ >> Wikisource, and the book. >> > > > Brian McNeil. > -- > http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter. > Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news. > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
