Why have [[WP:HRT]] used in this way at all? Just make the template namespace subject to FlaggedRevs. Then you're looking more at protecting templates so widely used that changes will have a cache-update hit. That's a performance-driven decision, not a 'political' one
Brian McNeil -- Wikinews, Accredited Reporter. Personal: brian.mcn...@o2.co.uk "Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news." > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Main page seen by library users - where is > Wikipedia? > From: Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> > Date: Fri, June 08, 2012 2:39 pm > To: HJ Mitchell <hjmitch...@ymail.com>, UK Wikimedia mailing list > <wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > > > On 8 June 2012 14:18, HJ Mitchell <hjmitch...@ymail.com> wrote: > > Well if you've got the patience, you could go through the recent changes, > > isolate it to the template namespace, and look for recent reverts and > > protections. But tracking it down the day after it's happened strikes as a > > bit like locking the stable door after the horse has bolted. > > Given that WP:HRT is explicitly case-by-case, someone needs to make a case. > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
