On 13 June 2012 16:38, Thomas Dalton > It might be worth talking to potential accreditors earlier rather than > later in the process (although not having already spoken to them two > days in is forgiveable!). One thing you'll need to agree with them in > the learning objectives, and they should be worked out before you get > too far with producing content.
So getting into more detail: what I'm proposing to do for WMUK myself includes four "baseline" tasks. One of those I didn't mention as a subproject, but it is the step of taking the baseline list of topics and rendering it into a baseline list of specifications of modules. So the spec here will be a standardised "what you will learn" at least. Technically you'd work with separate "aims" and "objectives", and having been told by a Board member that "objectives" should be at least potentially measurable, getting that deep at the baseline stage might be too much. I think I have to work out version control and categorisation of modules before knowing everything about what to do here. Spec might just mean a sensible two-category system first. By the way I intend to use A, B, C and X for assumed Wikimedia knowledge, for a coarse audience categorisation. So A = entry-level, B = intermediate, C = advanced: merging two articles appears first at B level, with added history merge at C level with some indication that the audience is admins or those who want to be. X is for self-styled expert. One thing that would fun would be the "So you think you know about?" series of quizzes. Think copyright mavens ... Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
