On 3 October 2012 11:15, Andrew Turvey <andrewrtur...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I though this was a largely accurate article without any major errors. Far > better than most media articles!
The main body of the article is very good. The summary at the top is simplified to the point of being inaccurate. The main article specifically talks about donations from Wikipedia visitors (which is an accurate description), while the summary just says "donations", which is obviously incorrect. The office have an excellent track record of getting these kinds of things fixed - it shouldn't take long to get them to add "from Wikipedia vistors" to the summary. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
