On 3 October 2012 12:16, Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course, that still wouldn't be right - 'through banners on Wikipedia' 
> would be more accurate. Getting media coverage 100% accurate is difficult (if 
> only they used wikis…) - sometimes inaccuracies just have to be lived with, 
> as grating as that is to any Wikimedian's soul. ;-)

I think it is implicit that "donations from Wikipedia visitors" means
"donations from Wikipedia visitors that are a direct result of them
visiting Wikipedia". No-one is going to expect us to quiz every donor
and turn them away if they say they once read a Wikipedia article!

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to