I agree with everything Joseph has said here. :) I see where Thomas Dalton is coming from, but I think he is being a little too harsh on the board (damned if they do, damned if they don't). This is the first step toward addressing miss-steps, and it is welcome.
Tom On 15 October 2012 12:59, joseph seddon <[email protected]>wrote: > I would like to commend the board for at least acknowledging that there > has been mistakes made. It may lack specifics but for me personally it is > much welcomed shift in tone which is a start. I do think that pre-empting > the review would be unwise but I do ask that the board publish the terms > of reference for the review as soon as possible. We need to try to do > this as open from the start and knowing the extent and nature of the review > is key to achieving this. > > I would like to echo the suggestion of an advisory or audit board. Its a > suggestion that I had universal support on previous board. A lack of time > has for the most part delayed this but I think its worth the board putting > some time into this. > > Seddon > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
