On 20 January 2013 19:16, WereSpielChequers <[email protected]> wrote: > Where the Geograph outscores WLM is that they aren't time limited, some of > their photographers have uploaded images from decades ago, and they cover > the same object in different seasons. I think that makes them more > compatible with Wikipedia, September foliage can hide some of the features > we want to photograph, winter snow can highlight earthworks and other > archaeology, past events are best illustrated with old photos, and > waterfalls in particular are much better illustrated with minigalleries > showing winter spate next to summer trickles.
Isn't WLM also non-time-limited? They have to be *submitted* to the contest (and Commons) in a specific month, but older images are still acceptable - see for example the Israeli winner, which was taken in the winter of 1992. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/29/wiki-loves-monuments-2012-the-israeli-finalists/ -- - Andrew Gray [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
