I don't want background. I want you to publish the report now. You don't
need any more response than "we're looking at it and are beginning
discussions with the community, we'll have a fuller response in a few
weeks". You could have written that months ago.

Last time you used the "we need to prepare a response" excuse to delay
publishing something you ended up publishing it without any response anyway
and nothing bad happened, so your good faith is very much in doubt.
On Feb 6, 2013 9:16 AM, "Jon Davies" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tom, It might be sensible to check with us directly before posting. We *
> have* been preparing but need to get a lot of consensus even for a 'short
> response'.  I think your email was unfair to Chris and a little rude.
> Please assume good faith.
>
> Phone me if you want more background.
>
> Jon
>
> On 6 February 2013 00:58, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't take two working days to prepare a short response saying that
>> the charity is now reviewing the report. In fact, that could have been
>> prepared in advance, since it is the same regardless of the contents. It is
>> extremely premature to be commenting on the contents to the press before
>> we've had any discussion about it.
>>
>> Publish the report now. You've had plenty of time. You're supposed to be
>> running an organisation that prides itself on being transparent.
>> On Jan 31, 2013 11:15 AM, "Chris Keating" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > 31 January 2013 (target), 15 February 2013 (deadline) - Final report
>>>> > - this is expected by the end of this week and will be published
>>>> promptly
>>>> > (not necessarily immediately) when we get it.
>>>>
>>>> Why won't you publish it immeadiately?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So that we have a chance to prepare responses for any media inquiries
>>> that might result from it. As I say, we will be prompt about it, and I also
>>> want to make sure there is a chance for the community to review the
>>> findings before our board meeting on the 9th. Someone from Compass
>>> Partnership will be attending that meeting, so if there are any questions
>>> or clarifications from the community, we can ask them then.
>>>
>>> Hope this make sense,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
> tweet @jonatreesdavies
>
> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
> Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.
>
> Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to