"Dispute" may be putting it a bit strongly but obviously there was a disagreement or it wouldn't have taken this long to reach an agreement. "Dispute" does suggest a dispute over who owns it, which was never true. Any dispute was over the future, not the past. On Feb 9, 2013 8:57 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9 February 2013 13:08, Thehelpfulone <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/14428/wikimedia_uk_trustees_have_been_too_involved_to_govern_the_charity > > This also refers to an "an intellectual property dispute over > QRPedia", which is, of course, bunkum. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
