The wmuk Secretary said nothing of the sort... On Feb 11, 2013 5:07 PM, "Charles Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 17:02, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not sure why you've attached your top-posted comment to my post; > > but to be clear; my purpose is not to apportion blame, nor to make > > criticisms I'm interested in correcting a false impression that has > > been given in the media of a dispute which did not occur. I'm > > delighted - and relieved - that agreement to transfer ownership of > > QRpedia has been reached, and have been calling for that for sometime. > > However, I don't wish to "move on" until reasonable efforts have been > > made to correct the aforesaid false impression.Your support in this > > endeavour would be welcome. > > I think we've established that your view that a false impression has > been given is that of someone with a partial view of the proceedings, > and that the WMUK Secretary, who has a fuller view to go on, doesn't > see things the same way. > > Move next business. > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
