Agree with Mike on that - and I hope everyone will be pleased to learn that we've already been talking to our developers about how best to implement a system to ensure a seamless changeover. We've been very lucky in finding two developers who know how to keep their eye on the community pulse and are willing to "go the extra mile" for us when we need them.
Thanks to all involved in making sure the technology works! -- Rexx On 11 February 2013 20:31, Michael Peel <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2013 7:59 PM, "geni" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of > > > QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget. > > > > There shouldn't be an issue there. The costs are minimal. Renewal costs > for two domain names and maybe a few hours work by the existing IT > contractors to transition things and sort out the security concerns that > have been raised. The budget can absorb that. > > The need to have developer resources available to set up QRpedia on WMUK > servers, and to maintain and improve it, has been thought about for a while > now and was incorporated into this year's developer budget (although the > activity plan doesn't explicitly state this). > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
