Look, if you want to argue that election rules apply to non-elected directors, that's your privilege.
On 12 April 2013 10:33, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Titles of legal documents rarely mean anything. > > On 12 Apr 2013 08:54, "James Farrar" <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, they do say that. In the name. Election rules. > > > > > > On 12 April 2013 00:11, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 12 Apr 2013 00:03, "James Farrar" <james.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > The election rules only apply to elected directors, surely. > >> > >> That's not what they say, though. Unless something is ambiguous or > impossible, legally it is interpreted literally. Intent is irrelevant. > >> > >> I am not a lawyer, so I don't know how a court would interpret the old > election rule in the context of the proposed articles, but we really > shouldn't be putting ourselves in a position where there is that kind of > uncertainty. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikimedia UK mailing list > >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia UK mailing list > > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
