The total number of votes can be inferred as the resolutions were voted on by the same people who participated in the Board election, so 44.
My past experience is that when a show of hands produces overwhelming support, it's not deemed necessary to count the "aye" hands. It can even be counterproductive as Aye + Nay + Abstain does not always equal Number of Votes Available. Which leads to a recount. Which is a gross waste of time in an overwhelming-support scenario. On 30 June 2013 23:49, Katie Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30/06/2013 21:33, Gordon Joly wrote: > >> On 30/06/13 10:55, Katie Chan wrote: >> >>> >>>> >>> Yes, they were passed without any opposes vote, but not every one of >>> 200-something members voted. >>> >>> KTC >>> >> Do you have the exact figures? >> >> > No. Since there were no opposition, an exact count of votes in the room > wasn't taken. Base on how many total votes were received for the board > election, I would guess mid to high forties voted including proxy. > > > KTC > > -- > Katie Chan > Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the > author and do not necessarily represent the view of any organisation the > author is associated with or employed by. > > > Experience is a good school but the fees are high. > - Heinrich Heine > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
