On 8 November 2013 11:33, Richard Nevell <[email protected]>wrote:

But, returning to the point of this thread: proofreading Wikisource. If
> there is an appetite to take part, how would it be best organised? Checking
> for typos and using a spellchecker seems like the simplest approach, would
> it be one which results in a significant impact?
>
> As a start, if WMUK thinks it would be putting some staff time towards
this competition, the best thing might be to start a thread at

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium#Announcements

just saying you are considering backing it.

English Wikisource runs a "Proofread of the Month" and one model would be
to adapt that to the needs of the competition ("all must have prizes" in
PoTM, namely a template on your userpage). So there could be a definite
bunch of works selected, where people proofread and validate them page by
page.

Charles
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to