A charity is to have a website controlled by employees under direction from the trustees who are elected by the members?
How awful. On 10 Jun 2014 16:02, "Fæ" <[email protected]> wrote: > Do any fellow unpaid volunteers have a view on the changeover of the > charity from using the volunteer controlled wiki as a front end, to > using a fixed employee controlled website? > > I feel this will be the end of the UK wiki in terms of being a public > landing site with immediate engagement with fellow volunteers. > Instead, we will have a public relations website subject to control by > the Chief Executive, presumably full of good news, and hidden behind > it will be the UK wiki, now acting only as a forum rather than a space > where volunteers could create pages that support fund-raisers, openly > discuss real issues, problems and so forth. > > As a community of volunteers, we seem to have let the charity > gradually drift away from being volunteer driven and volunteer centric > and become overly sensitive to public relations. I am not sure why we > let that happen. > > Link > https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Engine_room#Digital_design_work_required > > Fae > -- > [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
