On 14/09/15 08:51, WereSpielChequers wrote:
> Part of the problem here is that statuses such as city, town and village 
> don't always get taken away if a place declines in population or over the 
> centuries doesn't grow as fast as other cities. Case in point, in the 
> categorisation I've been doing on commons I occasionally come across 
> abandoned villages or churches that no longer have a village. But not 
> "hamlets that formerly were villages".
From the OSM view, being able to tag a former church which has now
become a residence or some other use makes perfect sense so the end_date
for it's life as a church can be used, but one camp in OSM simply want
to wipe historic data and simply show current usage. Unless the church
was 'noteworthy' it may not be a candidate for a wikipedia page? So
where does one maintain the history of that structure. Hamlets such as
Egremont, Carmarthenshire, Wales are probably a case in point ... should
I create a page from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egremont since I can
provide history details of it's existence and a location, but we can't
add it directly into OSM because 'it no longer exists on the ground' ...
but there is a church ...

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to