The media we have are primarily if not completely briefings by witnesses and people compiling the report. If we have exceptions to that we can deal with it but I don't think this is the most pressing problem for the report in question. Our goal here isn't to fix the internet or copyright but rather provide the content of the report and its supplementary evidence on Wikimedia so that it is preserved historically and there is no risk of content vanishing due to someone failing to renew hosting or something.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko) On 14 July 2016 at 14:54, Gordon Joly <gordon.j...@pobox.com> wrote: > On 13/07/16 09:01, とある白い猫 wrote: > > * > > > > > > These can be the rationale or part of the rationale we can use to > > persuade BBC etc. to willingly release such rights for a select number > > of files. > > > But they do not own the rights to everything. Two cases come to mind: > > 1) The Archer's Fan Club > > 2) Desert Island Discs. > > Many programmes will use snippets of music that are licenced in various > ways (e.g. allowed media and time duration). A radio drama might only be > allowed "on air" for a 28 days, or a year, since the rights for the > music used are time limited. > > Gordo > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
