Hi John,

I think you’re sending emails in HTML format, which come through to the list OK 
as an individual email, but HTML-formatted emails are removed from the digest 
("An HTML attachment was scrubbed”). So there are two options: change to using 
plain text format for the emails you send to the list, or change to receive 
individual messages rather than the digest.

Thanks,
Mike

> On 10 Apr 2018, at 15:05, John Byrne <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Once again my post is (to me) a header and blank text, but others can 
> evidently see it, which is something.  Katie seems to see the only possible 
> problem as the chapter getting criticised... 
> 
> John/Johnbod
> 
>> On 10 April 2018 at 18:57 [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 1. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (John Byrne) (John Lubbock) 2. Re: UK 
>> chapter membership numbers (John Byrne) (Stevie Benton)
>> 
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:54:28 +0100
>> From: John Lubbock 
>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list 
>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers (John
>> Byrne)
>> Message-ID:
>> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> We welcome constructive criticism, and I am happy to listen to any members'
>> concerns and ideas for improving Chapter-Community cohesion and
>> communication. :)
>> 
>> John Lubbock
>> 
>> Communications Coordinator
>> 
>> Wikimedia UK
>> 
>> +44 (0) 203 372 0767
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
>> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Office 1,
>> Ground Floor, Europoint, 5 - 11 Lavington Street, London SE1 0NZ.
>> 
>> Wikimedia UK is the national chapter of the global Wikimedia open knowledge
>> movement. We rely on donations from individuals to support our work to make
>> knowledge open for all. Have you considered supporting Wikimedia UK? Donate
>> here .
>> 
>> The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate
>> Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent
>> non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility
>> for its contents.*
>> 
>> On 10 April 2018 at 18:49, John Byrne wrote:
>>> 
>>> As very often in recent years, I got a notification of my post sent an
>>> hour or so ago, with completely blank text. Yet Katie has clearly seen it,
>>> as she quotes me. Have others also got blanks? Can the rather cryptic
>>> instructions for replies be clarified, or is there some bug? I get the
>>> digest version. It doesn't exactly encourage people to contribute, and may
>>> be a factor in the much lower activity on this list in recent years. It
>>> never used to happen.
>>> 
>>> No Katie, I don't think this has much to do with it, though you are right
>>> to imply that the chapter is over-sensitive to criticism...
>>> 
>>> John/Johnbod
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 18:37 [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>>> Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Charles Matthews) 2. UK chapter
>>> 
>>> membership numbers (John Byrne) 3. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Katie
>>> Chan) 4. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Richard Nevell)
>>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:25:51 +0100 (BST)
>>> From: Charles Matthews
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41 Fæ wrote:
>>> 
>>> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
>>> been no continued growth since whatever happened.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't know what happened. I did correspond with the office about a
>>> prompt to renew. One could simulate such a "one-off event" by simply asking
>>> people whose membership had lapsed to renew. I was doing this sort of thing
>>> for WMUK some seven years ago, so as an explanation it is not far-fetched.
>>> 
>>> Charles
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:31:33 +0100 (BST)
>>> From: John Byrne
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.co.uk>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:31:14 +0100
>>> From: Katie Chan
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Oh I don't know, maybe this "yawning gap" wouldn't be so wide if the
>>> chapter don't get criticised for both not increasing its membership numbers
>>> and having increased its membership numbers.
>>> Just a wide guess....
>>> KTC
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Samsung device
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:37:12 +0000
>>> From: Richard Nevell
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID:
>>> 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Dear Fae,
>>> 
>>> My memory could be failing me, but I thought it was explained at the AGM
>>> that the increase was a result of asking donors to become members.
>>> 
>>> It sounds like you are more interested in the 'how' of the process and the
>>> 'who' as you seem dissatisfied with the answer to *why* there was an
>>> increase. To make sure we're on the same page is that what you meant?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Richard Nevell
>>> 
>>> PS. Have you had a chance to look into the issue on Commons with the
>>> conflicting licence for some images from the Portable Antiquities Scheme?
>>> My question was archived before a reply.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41, Fæ wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, at the AGM the tripling of membership numbers was explained as
>>> being due to an increase in members joining. No meaningful facts were
>>> presented to the members, but the impression given by the Chair and
>>> the CEO was that there would be more information publicly available.
>>> 
>>> My question was "why". Sharing information about any discussion the
>>> trustees have had on improving protection against entryism, would be
>>> healthy for transparency, as would sharing exactly what happened that
>>> caused this massive, overnight, leap in membership totals. Currently,
>>> there is zero information on the nature of who joined, which may have
>>> been down to how they joined. As an example, if 351 people joined at
>>> an academic conference in London, then the people joining would be
>>> academics who go to events in London and if the 351 new members were
>>> found due to appeals by the CEO on Facebook, then the new members
>>> would be limited to people who follow or network with the CEO on
>>> Facebook.
>>> 
>>> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
>>> been no continued growth since whatever happened. Should the chapter
>>> start maintaining the published membership report again, then it will
>>> be possible for people apart from chapter employees to have access to
>>> the latest facts.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fae
>>> 
>>> On 9 April 2018 at 22:01, Richard Nevell
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Fae,
>>> 
>>> As was explained at the AGM the increase in the number of members was the
>>> result of a successful membership drive.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Richard Nevell
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9 Apr 2018 21:34, "Fæ" wrote:
>>> 
>>> During the last UK Chapter AGM, it was asked why the membership
>>> numbers had radically changed, there was no specific answer to the
>>> question. Was any analysis done on this afterwards? When reviewing
>>> membership it seems likely that the charity's trustees would have been
>>> concerned at these figures so shortly before the AGM, due to the
>>> potential risk of entryism.
>>> 
>>> Membership jumped from a total of 147 (a five year low) in May 2017,
>>> to the all time record high the following month of 498, i.e. new
>>> sign-ups that month more than *tripled* the total membership.
>>> 
>>> A second question - the report of membership numbers has been updated
>>> every month for the past five years.[1] It has not been updated since
>>> October 2017. Could anyone confirm what the most recent membership
>>> numbers are so the report can be updated?
>>> 
>>> P.S. the links in the FAQ about the register of members are out of
>>> date, the companylawclub link is a 404 error and the companieshouse
>>> link advises to go to their new website.
>>> 
>>> Links:
>>> 1. https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Numbers 
>>> <https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Numbers>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2.
>>> 
>>> https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteers_-_Frequently_Asked_ 
>>> <https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteers_-_Frequently_Asked_>
>>> Questions#Why_do_you_keep_a_register_of_members.3F
>>> >
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fae
>>> --
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae 
>>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae 
>>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimediauk-l mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> 
>>> End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 153, Issue 5
>>> *********************************************
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> 
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:57:30 +0100
>> From: Stevie Benton 
>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list 
>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers (John
>> Byrne)
>> Message-ID:
>> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> " though you are right to imply that the chapter is over-sensitive to
>> criticism... "
>> 
>> John, I must have missed that bit as I didn't see Katie imply that at all.
>> If anything, I think the chapter receives, and always has received, a lot
>> of unwarranted criticism from people who have ill-defined issues with how
>> it operates. Some people have always been very quick to rush to criticism
>> rather than gently join a conversation. Others simply have an axe to grind.
>> 
>> The chapter is doing a good job. Wouldn't it be nice if we heard people say
>> that more often?
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:49 PM, John Byrne wrote:
>>> 
>>> As very often in recent years, I got a notification of my post sent an
>>> hour or so ago, with completely blank text. Yet Katie has clearly seen it,
>>> as she quotes me. Have others also got blanks? Can the rather cryptic
>>> instructions for replies be clarified, or is there some bug? I get the
>>> digest version. It doesn't exactly encourage people to contribute, and may
>>> be a factor in the much lower activity on this list in recent years. It
>>> never used to happen.
>>> 
>>> No Katie, I don't think this has much to do with it, though you are right
>>> to imply that the chapter is over-sensitive to criticism...
>>> 
>>> John/Johnbod
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 18:37 [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Send Wikimediauk-l mailing list submissions to
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> 
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Wikimediauk-l digest..."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Today's Topics:
>>> Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Charles Matthews) 2. UK chapter
>>> 
>>> membership numbers (John Byrne) 3. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Katie
>>> Chan) 4. Re: UK chapter membership numbers (Richard Nevell)
>>> 
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:25:51 +0100 (BST)
>>> From: Charles Matthews
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41 Fæ wrote:
>>> 
>>> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
>>> been no continued growth since whatever happened.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't know what happened. I did correspond with the office about a
>>> prompt to renew. One could simulate such a "one-off event" by simply asking
>>> people whose membership had lapsed to renew. I was doing this sort of thing
>>> for WMUK some seven years ago, so as an explanation it is not far-fetched.
>>> 
>>> Charles
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:31:33 +0100 (BST)
>>> From: John Byrne
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.co.uk>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 18:31:14 +0100
>>> From: Katie Chan
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Oh I don't know, maybe this "yawning gap" wouldn't be so wide if the
>>> chapter don't get criticised for both not increasing its membership numbers
>>> and having increased its membership numbers.
>>> Just a wide guess....
>>> KTC
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Samsung device
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:37:12 +0000
>>> From: Richard Nevell
>>> To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK chapter membership numbers
>>> Message-ID:
>>> 
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>> 
>>> Dear Fae,
>>> 
>>> My memory could be failing me, but I thought it was explained at the AGM
>>> that the increase was a result of asking donors to become members.
>>> 
>>> It sounds like you are more interested in the 'how' of the process and the
>>> 'who' as you seem dissatisfied with the answer to *why* there was an
>>> increase. To make sure we're on the same page is that what you meant?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Richard Nevell
>>> 
>>> PS. Have you had a chance to look into the issue on Commons with the
>>> conflicting licence for some images from the Portable Antiquities Scheme?
>>> My question was archived before a reply.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10 April 2018 at 11:41, Fæ wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, at the AGM the tripling of membership numbers was explained as
>>> being due to an increase in members joining. No meaningful facts were
>>> presented to the members, but the impression given by the Chair and
>>> the CEO was that there would be more information publicly available.
>>> 
>>> My question was "why". Sharing information about any discussion the
>>> trustees have had on improving protection against entryism, would be
>>> healthy for transparency, as would sharing exactly what happened that
>>> caused this massive, overnight, leap in membership totals. Currently,
>>> there is zero information on the nature of who joined, which may have
>>> been down to how they joined. As an example, if 351 people joined at
>>> an academic conference in London, then the people joining would be
>>> academics who go to events in London and if the 351 new members were
>>> found due to appeals by the CEO on Facebook, then the new members
>>> would be limited to people who follow or network with the CEO on
>>> Facebook.
>>> 
>>> It appears that the jump in numbers was a one-off event, there has
>>> been no continued growth since whatever happened. Should the chapter
>>> start maintaining the published membership report again, then it will
>>> be possible for people apart from chapter employees to have access to
>>> the latest facts.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fae
>>> 
>>> On 9 April 2018 at 22:01, Richard Nevell
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Fae,
>>> 
>>> As was explained at the AGM the increase in the number of members was the
>>> result of a successful membership drive.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Richard Nevell
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9 Apr 2018 21:34, "Fæ" wrote:
>>> 
>>> During the last UK Chapter AGM, it was asked why the membership
>>> numbers had radically changed, there was no specific answer to the
>>> question. Was any analysis done on this afterwards? When reviewing
>>> membership it seems likely that the charity's trustees would have been
>>> concerned at these figures so shortly before the AGM, due to the
>>> potential risk of entryism.
>>> 
>>> Membership jumped from a total of 147 (a five year low) in May 2017,
>>> to the all time record high the following month of 498, i.e. new
>>> sign-ups that month more than *tripled* the total membership.
>>> 
>>> A second question - the report of membership numbers has been updated
>>> every month for the past five years.[1] It has not been updated since
>>> October 2017. Could anyone confirm what the most recent membership
>>> numbers are so the report can be updated?
>>> 
>>> P.S. the links in the FAQ about the register of members are out of
>>> date, the companylawclub link is a 404 error and the companieshouse
>>> link advises to go to their new website.
>>> 
>>> Links:
>>> 1. https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Numbers 
>>> <https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Membership/Numbers>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2.
>>> 
>>> https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteers_-_Frequently_Asked_ 
>>> <https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Volunteers_-_Frequently_Asked_>
>>> Questions#Why_do_you_keep_a_register_of_members.3F
>>> >
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Fae
>>> --
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae 
>>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae 
>>> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL:
>>> 
>>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimediauk-l mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> 
>>> End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 153, Issue 5
>>> *********************************************
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>>> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk <https://wikimedia.org.uk/>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> 
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimediauk-l mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l 
>> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l>
>> 
>> 
>> End of Wikimediauk-l Digest, Vol 153, Issue 7
>> *********************************************
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Reply via email to