> The definition of lewdness may not be obvious, but that doesn't mean that we > aren't capable of coming up with a good one to use within the context of the > law.
The definition in the context of UK law is simply what a "reasonable person" considers indecent, there is no set definition. The sentencing guidelines talk about "erotic posing" (as the least serious form of indecency, there are obviously more serious forms that are far easier to define). > I'd like to hear your definition, especially with regard to what type > of exhibitionist acts a parent can legally convince his young daughter to > perform. I don't much care for assertions of what "plenty of people" > believe if they aren't attached to explanations as to *why* those people > believe that. My definition of "erotic" would require there to be a sexual element. Nudity is not automatically sexual, there would need to be something about the pose which could be reasonably associated with sex. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
