Thanks for the info.
Yeah, it would be good to analyze the data and see what worked and what
not.
How's going in the English contest?

Aubrey



On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Carles Paredes Lanau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Catalan Wikipedia has a link to contest too. The reason of Italian success
> is that only count validated pages. In Catalan contest the most
> contributions proofreads pages (75%),  because it's three points and
> validates 1 point. Although the activity is awesome too.
>
> Next week,  we should analyze this contest for future editions.
> El dia 27/11/2013 9.16, "Andrea Zanni" <[email protected]> va
> escriure:
>
>>  Dear Wikisourcerors,
>> English, Catalan and Italian Wikisource are running a proofreading
>> contest.
>> Looking at the stats (http://toolserver.org/~phe/statistics.php?diff=1)
>> we see that the Italian Wikisource is way more succesfull: this is
>> probably due to the fact that we have a link to the contest on the Italian
>> Wikipedia.
>> I would suggest you to ask the community to run it for you for the last
>> days,
>> it could be a boost for the contest.
>> And, hopefully, some users will stay :-)
>>
>> Aubrey
>>
>> PS: I also think that the "lottery" prize, which we copied from the
>> Catalan contest, is a great idea. In the Italian contest, the second and
>> third prize will be extracted from the validated pages: this means that
>> everyone has a chance to win, and the more I read the more chance I have.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Reply via email to