You should ask Tpt, he's the one working with OAI-PMH. Very happy Luiz that you want to mess with that page, as we probably need some tests to make it up and running for different scenarios, as far as I know few Wikisources actually use it.
I'm currently speaking with 2 companies which do "digital lending", meaning, lending ebooks. I told them about that page and related. I still have no feedback about though. Aubrey On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Luiz Augusto <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Billinghurst, > > I think that you have misunderstood the mentioned special page. > > The Oai portion on [[Special:ProofreadIndexOai]] reffers to OAI-PMH (Open > Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting), not OAuth =) > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:26 AM, billinghurst <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Luiz, >> >> I don't see it listed at >> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:OAuthListConsumers >> which is where all approved clients are listed at this time (though the >> plan is to move the process to meta at some point). >> >> Regards, Billinghurst >> >> >> >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:54:18 -0300, Luiz Augusto <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I've just found [[Special:ProofreadIndexOai]] and loved it! >> > >> > Firstly, why this special page isn't listed at [[Special:SpecialPages]]? >> > >> > Second, [1] points to [2], that returns a 404 error. >> > >> > Oka, now I'll ask the most important thing: how to implement it!? =) >> > >> > The doc page [3] mentions a page stored in the MediaWiki namespace, but >> > that page is almost empty on it.wikisource and don't ever was created on >> > en.wikisource. Those domains contains DC fields such as title, creator, >> > issued. >> > >> > The MediaWiki page was also ever created on pt.wikisource, but all >> metadata >> > that it returns to me is type and format. >> > >> > ---- >> > As a side note, I really love all efforts done in ProofreadPage >> extension. >> > It's amazing that a plugin developed entirely in a volunteer basis, with >> > little or none input from the main product (MediaWiki) developer team, >> has >> > achieved such level of quality and complexity. >> > >> > But, please, give some love and attention to maintain it's >> documentation. >> > Do it remembering that it will be crucial for small Wikisources, since >> most >> > of the time only one or two users retains all the very specific >> knowledge >> > necessary to try to develop and atract new users for that subdomain. >> > >> > Reverse engineering to discover how something works is a time consuming >> > task, like all the remaining core tasks. At the end, those local experts >> > users ends in getting no fun contributing to Wikisource because firstly >> > needs to do lots of additional and sometimes bureaucratic work if really >> > wants to not being the only user in such wiki. >> > >> > We all are in the same boat, trying to colect works in copyleft or >> public >> > domain in a project that the main organization behind we (Wikimedia >> > Foundation) neither try to help us or know how to help us (in fact, >> mostly >> > of us, myself included, don't know also on what can be helped), please >> help >> > each other on what is possible. >> > >> > [what a melodramatic message I just wrote LOL] >> > >> > ---- >> > >> > [1] - >> > >> >> https://wikisource.org/wiki/Special:ProofreadIndexOai?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=prp_qdc >> > >> > [2] - http://mediawiki.org/xml/proofreadpage/qdc/ >> > >> > [3] - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Proofread_Page#OAI-PMH >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
