I support too. It will allow oldwikisource to share the same configuration as language-based Wikisources. But we should really ask sysadmins if it's possible.
Feel free to open a bug [1] asking if it's possible to move oldwikisource to mul.wikisource.org and to add it in the "wikisource" site group. The second step would be to open a formal vote on oldWikisource. Thomas [1] https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Wikimedia Le 14 mars 2014 à 00:23, David Cuenca <[email protected]> a écrit : > I support Adam's idea too! Since mul.ws would be a project that affects all > languages (or at least those who would want to use it to store their > multilingual works), we could create a discussion page about this, and ask > both the editors of oldwikisource and the members of the Wikisource User > Group to give feedback about the move oldwikisource->mul. > > That way wikidata could be deployed earlier without having to wait for an > implementation that might take a looong time to happen. > > Micru > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> wrote: > I strongly support Adam's idea, and I add that a mul-wikisource could the > perfect site to collect best coding/formatting standards and ideas, scripts, > modules and templates to share them; this could be a great help for minor > wikisource projects and an incouragement to KISS and to standardize practices > for the major ones. > > Really, my personal dream would be a unique, multilanguage wikisource just as > there's a unique, multilanguage media container: Commons, and an unique, > multilanguage container for structured data, Wikidata, for identical reasons; > but this - I presume - can't be realized any more. What can be realized is, > to remove any discouragement to upload into oldwikisource books in any > language, to add a mul prefix so that books can be freely interlinked and to > encourage to upload there multilanguage books. > > Here: https://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium#Multilanguage_works > I told about some time ago. > > Alex brollo > > > 2014-03-13 22:37 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <[email protected]>: > > 2014-03-13 22:26 GMT+01:00 Adam Morgan <[email protected]>: > > > > > I've been wondering: is there any benefit in actually getting oldwikisource > > moved to the "mul" language subdomain? Also, how hard would this be? > > Would it be more effort than is worth making (or worth requesting that > > someone else makes, anyway)? > > It sounds like a good idea (and I think it has been already discussed > somewhere) but I don't know about the technic part/feasibility. > > [snip] > > > There have been some objections to hosting a bilingual book on English > > Wikisource > > Do you have some URLs about that. It's seems pretty illogical to me. > On all the other wikisources, there is bilingual books (and trilingual, > quadrilingual, etc. multilingual books). On the breton wikisource, nearly 50% > of the 145 books are bilingual ; moving them on old/mul.ws would be a damn > loss :( > > > Mul.ws could operate as more than just an incubator > > Oldwikisource is already more than just an incubator ;) > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > > -- > Etiamsi omnes, ego non > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
