Please add my name to this pile-on as well! :) Cheers, Craig
On 14 March 2014 09:23, David Cuenca <[email protected]> wrote: > I support Adam's idea too! Since mul.ws would be a project that affects > all languages (or at least those who would want to use it to store their > multilingual works), we could create a discussion page about this, and ask > both the editors of oldwikisource and the members of the Wikisource User > Group to give feedback about the move oldwikisource->mul. > > That way wikidata could be deployed earlier without having to wait for an > implementation that might take a looong time to happen. > > Micru > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Alex Brollo <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I strongly support Adam's idea, and I add that a mul-wikisource could the >> perfect site to collect best coding/formatting standards and ideas, >> scripts, modules and templates to share them; this could be a great help >> for minor wikisource projects and an incouragement to KISS and to >> standardize practices for the major ones. >> >> Really, my personal dream would be a unique, multilanguage wikisource >> just as there's a unique, multilanguage media container: Commons, and an >> unique, multilanguage container for structured data, Wikidata, for >> identical reasons; but this - I presume - can't be realized any more. What >> can be realized is, to remove any discouragement to upload into >> oldwikisource books in any language, to add a mul prefix so that books can >> be freely interlinked and to encourage to upload there multilanguage books. >> >> Here: >> https://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Scriptorium#Multilanguage_works I >> told about some time ago. >> >> Alex brollo >> >> >> 2014-03-13 22:37 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> 2014-03-13 22:26 GMT+01:00 Adam Morgan <[email protected]>: >>> >>> > >>> > I've been wondering: is there any benefit in actually getting >>> oldwikisource moved to the "mul" language subdomain? Also, how hard would >>> this be? Would it be more effort than is worth making (or worth requesting >>> that someone else makes, anyway)? >>> >>> It sounds like a good idea (and I think it has been already discussed >>> somewhere) but I don't know about the technic part/feasibility. >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> > There have been some objections to hosting a bilingual book on >>> English Wikisource >>> >>> Do you have some URLs about that. It's seems pretty illogical to me. >>> On all the other wikisources, there is bilingual books (and trilingual, >>> quadrilingual, etc. multilingual books). On the breton wikisource, nearly >>> 50% of the 145 books are bilingual ; moving them on old/mul.ws would be >>> a damn loss :( >>> >>> > Mul.ws could operate as more than just an incubator >>> >>> Oldwikisource is already more than just an incubator ;) >>> >>> Cdlt, ~nicolas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikisource-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> >> > > > -- > Etiamsi omnes, ego non > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
